YOUR AUDIENCE IS OUT THERE. They just haven't stopped for you yet.

An enterprise AI company had strong inbound interest and a warm addressable market — but deals kept stalling after one demo. A segmented ABM drip architecture, built on deep research into three very different buyers, turned pipeline that wasn't moving into pipeline that was.

Client
Enterprise AI · sports media
Channels
Email · newsletter · LinkedIn ads
Lead tracks
2, with 8 branching journeys
Time to result
1 quarter
The objective
Turn a warm, credible market into booked demos — with content specific enough to prove the product understands their world.
0%
More activity from cold responses
0%
Passive leads reaching demo request
0
Branching lead journeys built
0%
Funnel-mapped content assets
01 — The problem

Pipeline was building. It wasn't moving.

A genuinely differentiated product, and a warm addressable market — broadcasters, sports federations, media rights holders already feeling the pressure to do more with their content libraries.

But despite strong inbound interest, deals were stalling. Prospects would engage once — download something, attend a demo — then drift. The sales cycle was long, the buying committee was wide, and there was no structured content system keeping the brand present and credible throughout.

The team had leads. They didn't have momentum.

02 — The insight

Same message, different temperatures.

The core issue wasn't awareness, or even intent. Different leads were arriving at different temperatures, with different context — and all being handled the same way. Someone who'd just raised their hand through a paid LinkedIn ad needed a different conversation than someone who'd already sat through a demo but hadn't booked a follow-up.

The second issue was content specificity. Enterprise buyers in sports media don't respond to generic AI narratives — they respond to proof the product understands their world. That meant going deeper than "sports media" as a category, into research on what each buyer inside it actually loses sleep over.

Broadcasters

What does this mean for football, specifically?

Generic "AI for media" doesn't land. A football broadcaster wants to know what it means for football content revenue — named, not implied.

Sports federations

Thirty years of footage, sitting idle

Federations are archive-rich and monetisation-poor. The proof point that lands: a dormant archive turned into a searchable, licensable library.

Media rights holders

Moderation at a scale no team can staff

Rights holders managing user-generated and archival footage care about moderation accuracy and speed above almost anything else.

Three buyers inside one category, each needing their own proof. So the plan became: split active, MQL-qualified leads from passive, content-driven ones — and give each a segmented journey that branches on real engagement signals.

03 — The solution

Two tracks, eight branches.

A full multichannel ABM drip architecture was built across two lead tracks — every email, ad, and newsletter touch written with one specific job: introduce a use case, overcome an objection, or move the reader one step closer to a conversation.

Active MQL

Arriving through demo ads or direct outreach

A high-intent sequence focused on getting a demo scheduled, with branches handling non-responses and re-engagement through capability-led emails.

Passive lead

Arriving through gated case studies & the newsletter

A longer awareness-to-consideration arc, content mapped to their vertical, CTAs calibrated to their stage — until they were ready for the first track.

Active MQLDemo ad or outreach reply
Book-demo email No response → capability email Demo scheduled
Passive leadDownloaded a gated asset
Vertical-specific case study Engaged → moves to Active MQL Inactive → monthly newsletter

Specific enough to feel written for them

Every ad framed around the reader's own vertical — never a generic "AI for media" line.

linkedin.com/feed
Sports Media AI PlatformPromoted
What does AI mean for football content revenue — specifically? A look at how broadcasters are re-monetising archive footage.
👍 Like💬 Comment↗ Share
Broadcasters
linkedin.com/feed
Sports Media AI PlatformPromoted
Thirty years of match footage. Zero of it searchable. Here's how one federation made its entire archive licensable in six weeks.
👍 Like💬 Comment↗ Share
Sports federations

The mid-funnel anchor

Vertical-specific case studies, positioned as the natural next step after the ad — never a generic whitepaper.

resources — case study
Case study · Football
Re-monetising 30 years of archive footage with AI tagging

How one federation turned a dormant archive into a searchable, licensable content library.

Routes to: Active MQL track on engagement
resources — datasheet
Datasheet · Moderation
Moderating user-generated sports footage at platform scale

Accuracy and turnaround benchmarks for rights holders fielding thousands of clips a week.

Routes to: Active MQL track on engagement

The long game: a newsletter that earns its open rate

Leads who go quiet don't get dropped — they get folded into a monthly sports-media-AI newsletter until a new signal brings them back into an active track.

inbox — 1 new message
SM
Sports Media AI · MonthlyWhat broadcasters shipped with AI this month
Monthly
3 archives went searchable this month — here's how

Hi Kabir — you downloaded our football case study a while back. No pitch here, just what's actually shipping across sports media right now, and one thing worth 5 minutes if you're still curious.

Read this month's issue →
Purpose: stay credible and present, at no cost to sales' time
“Sales conversations improved in quality too — prospects arrived better informed, and more specific in their questions.” Quarter-one review
04 — The results

A funnel that finally tells you why.

Within the first quarter, the same warm market started converting — because it was finally being spoken to as three different audiences, not one.

↑38%
More demo bookings from nurtured leads
  • 12% of passive leads reach a demo requestWithin 30 days of entering the nurture track — previously a dead end.
  • 8 branching journeys, liveAcross two tracks, each routing on real engagement signal, not a guess.
  • Sales sees the drop-off, for the first timeA feedback loop that keeps improving conversion past the initial build.
Before

One-time downloads that went nowhere. Active and passive leads treated identically. No visibility into drop-off.

After

Two branching tracks, eight journeys, content mapped to vertical and funnel stage. Every drop-off point visible and actionable.

Leads stalling after one touch?

Thirty minutes. We'll map your funnel's drop-off points and what a segmented journey could look like — yours to keep either way.